Citation Nr: 21071776 Decision Date: 12/01/21 Archive Date: 12/01/21 DOCKET NO. 17-25 479 DATE: December 1, 2021 ORDER The issue of service connection for migraine headaches is dismissed as moot. The issue of service connection for a traumatic brain injury (TBI) is dismissed as moot. The issue of service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is dismissed as moot. The issue of a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) is dismissed as moot. The issue of service connection for a low back disability is dismissed. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. In a July 2020 rating decision issued before the promulgation of a decision in this appeal, the agency of original jurisdiction (AOJ) granted service connection for migraine headaches residual of a TBI, persistent depressive disorder, and a TDIU effective January 28, 2015, representing a full grant of the benefit sought on appeal. 2. In July 2020, the Veteran submitted an appeals satisfaction notice that manifested his satisfaction with the July 2020 supplemental statement of the case (SSOC) and his wish to withdraw the remaining issue of service connection for a low back disability associated with his appeal. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 1. The appeal is dismissed as there remains no disagreement of law or fact on appeal as the AOJ granted the benefit sought on appeal in full and rendered moot the claim of a TDIU and service connection for migraine headaches, a TBI, and an acquired psychiatric disorder. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d). 2. The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran for dismissal of the claim of service connection for a low back disability is met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d); 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS The Veteran served on active duty from September 1983 to September 1985 and May 1987 to June 1989. This case is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a November 2013 and September 2015 rating decisions from a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO). In November 2019, the Veteran testified at a Board hearing. The transcript of the hearing has been associated with the record. The Board remanded this case for further development in February 2020. A July 2020 rating decision granted service connection for migraine headaches residual of a TBI, persistent depressive disorder, and a TDIU effective January 28, 2015, the entire period on appeal, which constituted a full grant of the benefit sought. A July 2020 SSOC informed the Veteran that the claim for service connection for a low back disability remained denied. Shortly thereafter, in July 2020, the Veteran submitted a signed appeals satisfaction notice. By signing and submitting this form, the Veteran manifested his satisfaction with the decision rendered as well as his wish to withdraw the remaining issue associated with his appeal. The Board finds the instructions on the appeals satisfaction notice were unambiguous and that the Veteran made the withdrawal with a full understanding of the consequences. See DeLisio v. Shinseki, 25 Vet. App. 45, 57 (2011). In November 2021, the Veteran's representative submitted a Written Brief Presentation, which supported the claims, but did not address the changes in the case following the July 2020 rating decision, July 2020 SSOC, and July 2020 appeals satisfaction notice. Based on the above, the Board concludes that the Veteran has withdrawn his appeal for the claim of service connection for a low back disability, and there remains no disagreement of law or fact for the Board to resolve regarding the issues of TDIU and service connection for migraine headaches, a TBI, and an acquired psychiatric disorder. As there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal. The appeal is dismissed. See 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d). R. FEINBERG Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Attorney for the Board Costa, Stephanie D. The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.