Citation Nr: 21074059
Decision Date: 12/14/21	Archive Date: 12/14/21

DOCKET NO. 11-13 601
DATE: December 14, 2021

ORDER

The appeal of the issue of entitlement to a total disability rating based upon individual unemployability (TDIU) is dismissed.

The appeal of the issue of entitlement to an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent, for service-connected tinea corporis/versicolor with folliculitis, dermatitis, psoriasis, dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT

On October 19, 2021, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the appellant that a withdrawal of this appeal is requested.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for withdrawal of a substantive appeal as to the issues of (i) entitlement to a TDIU, and (ii) entitlement to an initial disability rating in excess of 10 percent, for service-connected tinea corporis/versicolor with folliculitis, dermatitis, psoriasis, have been met by the appellant. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105. An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. In the present case, the appellant has withdrawn his substantive appeal to the Board regarding the issues of entitlement to a TDIU and entitlement to a disability rating in excess of 10 percent for the service-connected tinea corporis/versicolor with folliculitis, dermatitis, and psoriasis.  In this regard, the Veteran submitted an Appeals Satisfaction Notice in October 2021 indicating that he was withdrawing all remaining issues on appeal that were listed in the most recent supplemental statement of the case.  As such, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration with respect to those issues. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and it is dismissed.

 

L. B. CRYAN

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans' Appeals

Attorney for the Board	B. KAYS HUKILL

The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.