Citation Nr: 21006653
Decision Date: 02/04/21	Archive Date: 02/04/21

DOCKET NO. 18-32 856
DATE: February 4, 2021

ORDER

The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for a prostate condition is dismissed.

The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for vertigo is dismissed.

The appeal regarding entitlement to service connection for voiding dysfunction is dismissed.

The appeal regarding entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability (TDIU) is dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT

On December 2, 2020, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran that he wished to withdraw his appeal as to the issues of entitlement to service connection for a prostate condition, vertigo, a voiding dysfunction, and TDIU.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

1. The criteria for withdrawal by the Veteran of the issue of entitlement to service connection for a prostate condition are met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55.

2. The criteria for withdrawal by the Veteran of the issue of entitlement to service connection for vertigo are met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55.

3. The criteria for withdrawal by the Veteran of the issue of entitlement to service connection for voiding dysfunction are met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55.

4. The criteria for withdrawal by the Veteran of the issue of entitlement to TDIU are met.  38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed.  38 U.S.C. § 7105.  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision.  38 C.F.R. § 19.55.  Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative.  38 C.F.R. § 19.55.  In the present case, the Veteran has withdrawn this appeal.  See December 2020 Veteran communication.  Hence, there remain no allegations of error of fact or law for appellate consideration.  Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review the appeal and the issues on appeal are dismissed.

 

 

DONNIE R. HACHEY

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans’ Appeals

Attorney for the Board	Katie Poe, Associate Counsel

The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.