Citation Nr: 21011847 Decision Date: 03/02/21 Archive Date: 03/02/21 DOCKET NO. 20-24 129 DATE: March 2, 2021 ORDER The appeal is dismissed. FINDING OF FACT The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has been notified that the Veteran died in January 2021. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the Veteran, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of the appeal at this time. 38 U.S.C. §§ 5121A, 7104(a) (2012); 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1010, 20.1106, 20.1302 (2019). REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Veteran served on active duty in the United States Marine Corps from October 1979 to January 1983 and from May 1983 to September 1987. Entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) The Board has recharacterized the Veteran’s claim for PTSD more broadly to an acquired psychiatric disability, to include PTSD, in order to clarify the nature of the benefit sought and ensure complete consideration of the claim. Clemons v. Shinseki, 23 Vet. App. 1, 5-6, 8 (2009). Unfortunately, the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal. As a matter of law, veterans’ claims do not survive their deaths. Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997). Thus, the claim on appeal for entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disability, to include PTSD, has become moot by virtue of the death of the Veteran and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 38 U.S.C. § 7104(a); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302. In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by the Veteran. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1106. The Board’s dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the Veteran for purposes of processing any claim to completion. Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the Veteran’s death. See 38 U.S.C. § 5121A; 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b). D. Martz Ames Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans’ Appeals Attorney for the Board T. Carter, Counsel The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.