Citation Nr: 21015238
Decision Date: 03/17/21	Archive Date: 03/17/21

DOCKET NO. 17-19 853
DATE: March 17, 2021

ORDER

Entitlement to service connection for a skin disorder, to include keratoses, is dismissed.

Entitlement to service connection for erectile dysfunction is dismissed.

Entitlement to service connection for urinary incontinence is dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT

In August 2020, the Board remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for a skin disorder, to include keratoses; erectile dysfunction; and for urinary incontinence, and the RO granted service connection for these disabilities in February 2021 rating decisions.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

There being no justiciable case or controversy, the Veteran’s service connection claims are dismissed.  38 U.S.C. § 7105.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

The Veteran served on active duty in the Air Force from February 1964 to February 1968.  

The Veteran presented sworn testimony at a hearing before the undersigned in May 2019.

In August 2020, the Board remanded the issues of entitlement to service connection for a skin disorder, to include keratoses; erectile dysfunction; and for urinary incontinence, and the RO granted service connection for these disabilities in February 2021 rating decisions.

Thus, the Veteran’s claims of entitlement to service connection for a skin disorder, to include keratoses; erectile dysfunction; and for urinary incontinence, are thus moot as the benefits sought on appeal are already in effect.  See Baughman v. Derwinski, 1 Vet. App. 563, 566 (1991).

 

 

STEVEN D. REISS

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans’ Appeals

Attorney for the Board	S. D. Regan, Counsel

The Board’s decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.