Citation Nr: 21027232
Decision Date: 05/05/21	Archive Date: 05/05/21

DOCKET NO. 16-31 424
DATE: May 5, 2021

REMANDED

Entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded.

REASONS FOR REMAND

The Veteran served on active duty from December 1974 to November 1975.

This matter was previously before the Board and remanded in October 2018 and January 2020. Unfortunately, another remand is required. 

1. Entitlement to service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder is remanded.

The Board is unclear as to the Veteran's appropriate diagnosis. Medical treatment records show diagnoses of PTSD and depressive disorder. However, a February 2020 VA examination states that the only diagnosis is unspecified personality disorder. The February 2020 medical opinion stated that the Veteran's psychiatric symptoms are most likely attributable to a personality disorder. However, as part of the rationale, the examiner indicated that the Veteran did not report symptoms such as nightmares and anhedonia. Prior medical treatment records indicate that the Veteran did report those symptoms. Remand is necessary for an opinion that accounts for the Veteran's entire record. 

The matter is REMANDED for the following action:

1. Obtain an addendum opinion from an appropriate clinician clarifying the Veteran's psychiatric diagnosis. Should the clinician determine that examination is necessary, one should be scheduled. Any diagnosis provided must be accompanied by a well-supported rationale that addresses the prior diagnoses and reported symptoms of record.

2. After the above development, and any additionally indicated development, has been completed, readjudicate the issue on appeal.  If the benefit sought is not granted to the Veteran's satisfaction, send the Veteran and his representative a Supplemental Statement of the Case and provide an opportunity to respond.  If necessary, return the case to the Board for further appellate review.

 

 

H. N. SCHWARTZ

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans' Appeals

Attorney for the Board	A. Creegan

The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.