Citation Nr: 21029811 Decision Date: 05/17/21 Archive Date: 05/17/21 DOCKET NO. 20-02 690 DATE: May 17, 2021 ORDER The appeal for a rating higher than 40 percent for service- connected spine is dismissed. The appeal for a rating higher than 20 percent for service- connected left lower extremity radiculopathy is dismissed. The appeal for an initial compensable rating for service-connected scar is dismissed. The appeal for an initial compensable rating for service- connected right lower extremity radiculopathy, higher than 10 percent from December 20, 2016, and higher than 20 percent from March 7, 2019, is dismissed. The appeal for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for a scar is dismissed. The appeal for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for right lower extremity radiculopathy, is dismissed. FINDING OF FACT On February 8, 2021, prior to the promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Board received notification from the Veteran and his attorney that a withdrawal of the remaining issues on appeal was requested. CONCLUSION OF LAW The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal by the Veteran and his attorney have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105; 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to allege specific error of fact or law in the determination being appealed. 38 U.S.C. § 7105. An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal at any time before the Board promulgates a decision. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative. 38 C.F.R. § 19.55. In the present case, the Veteran and his attorney has withdrawn this appeal and, hence, there remain no allegations of errors of fact or law for appellate consideration. Accordingly, the Board does not have jurisdiction to review these appeals and they are dismissed. VICTORIA MOSHIASHWILI Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Attorney for the Board Bruton, Cherrelle M. The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.