Citation Nr: 21042789
Decision Date: 07/13/21	Archive Date: 07/13/21

DOCKET NO. 18-16 898
DATE: July 13, 2021

ORDER

A disability rating in excess of 50 percent for the service-connected posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is dismissed.

A compensable disability rating for the service-connected left ear hearing loss is dismissed.

A disability evaluation in excess of 10 percent for the service-connected ischemic heart disease (IHD) is dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT.

In July 2021, the Board was notified that the Veteran died in June 2021, during the pendency of the appeal, which consists of claims for a disability rating in excess of 50 percent for the service-connected PTSD, a compensable disability rating for service-connected hearing loss, and a rating in excess of 10 percent for the service-connected IHD. 

CONCLUSION OF LAW

Due to the death of the appellant, the Board has no jurisdiction to adjudicate the merits of this appeal at this time.  38 U.S.C. § 7104(a); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

The Veteran served on active duty in the United States Army from October 1966 to October 1986.  The Veteran died in June 2021. 

This matter is before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (the Board) on appeal from a March 2014 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO) rating decision.  The rating decision continued the 50 percent disability rating for the service-connected PTSD, continued the 10 percent disability rating for the service-connected IHD, and continued a noncompensable disability rating for the service-connected left ear hearing loss.  The Veteran's Notice of Disagreement (NOD) was received in August 2014.  The Statement of the Case was issued in February 2018, and the Veteran's VA Form 9, substantive appeal to the Board was received in March 2018. 

Unfortunately, the appellant died during the pendency of the appeal.  As a matter of law, appellants' claims do not survive their deaths. Zevalkink v. Brown, 102 F.3d 1236, 1243-44 (Fed. Cir. 1996); Smith v. Brown, 10 Vet. App. 330, 333-34 (1997); Landicho v. Brown, 7 Vet. App. 42, 47 (1994).  This appeal on the merits has become moot by virtue of the death of the appellant and must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.  38 U.S.C. § 7104(a); 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302.  

In reaching this determination, the Board intimates no opinion as to the merits of this appeal or to any derivative claim brought by a survivor of the Veteran.  38 C.F.R. § 20.1106.  

(Continued on the next page)

 

The Board's dismissal of this appeal does not affect the right of an eligible person to file a request to be substituted as the appellant for purposes of processing the claim to completion.  Such request must be filed not later than one year after the date of the appellant's death.  38 U.S.C. § 5121A; 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b).  A person eligible for substitution includes "a living person who would be eligible to receive accrued benefits due to the claimant under section 5121(a) of this title ..." 38 U.S.C. § 5121A; 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(a).  An eligible party seeking substitution in an appeal that has been dismissed by the Board due to the death of the claimant should file a request for substitution with the VA office from which the claim originated.  38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(b).

 

 

L. B. CRYAN

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans' Appeals

Attorney for the Board	Kuksova, Kseniya

The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.