Citation Nr: 22014463
Decision Date: 03/14/22	Archive Date: 03/14/22

DOCKET NO. 18-50 538
DATE: March 14, 2022

ORDER

The appeal as to whether the action taken on June 24, 2014, to terminate VA Benefits due to Veteran's return to active duty effective February 23, 2013, and the overpayment amount created is valid, is dismissed.

FINDING OF FACT

In February 2022, prior to promulgation of a decision in the appeal, the Veteran notified VA that he wished to withdraw his appeal.

CONCLUSION OF LAW

The criteria for withdrawal of an appeal have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7105(d); 38 C.F.R. § 19.55.

REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION

The Veteran served on active duty from March 1978 to March 1982, September 1996 to September 2002, and February 2003 to July 2014.

This case comes before the Board of Veterans' Appeals (Board) on appeal from a June 2014 decision by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Regional Office (RO).

Withdrawal of Appeal

The Board may dismiss any appeal which fails to identify the specific determination with which the claimant disagrees.  38 U.S.C. § 7105(d).  An appeal may be withdrawn as to any or all issues involved in the appeal.  38 C.F.R. § 19.55 (a).  Withdrawal may be made by the appellant or by his or her authorized representative.  Id.

In a February 2022 letter, the Veteran indicated that he wants to withdraw his hearing and appeal.  The Veteran stated that there is no longer a debt, and he desires to put the matter at rest.  This statement reflects a desire to withdraw the appeal with respect to the issues of whether the action taken on June 24, 2014, to terminate VA Benefits due to Veteran's return to active duty effective February 23, 2013, and the overpayment amount created is valid.  This statement constitutes a valid withdrawal of the Veteran's appeal as it complied with the requirement of the applicable regulation by including the name of the Veteran, the applicable VA file number, and a statement that the appeal was withdrawn.  See Hembree v. Wilkie, 33 Vet. App. 1, 8 (2020) (written withdrawals need only comply with 38 C.F.R. § 20.204 (b), now 38 C.F.R. § 19.55(b) as applicable to legacy claims).

Based on the above, there is no specific determination with which the claimant disagrees as to the claim on appeal, and dismissal of the appeal is therefore warranted.

 

 

Jonathan Hager

Veterans Law Judge

Board of Veterans' Appeals

Attorney for the Board	R. Walker, Counsel

The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.