Citation Nr: 25004471 Decision Date: 04/02/25 Archive Date: 04/02/25 DOCKET NO. 17-26 352 DATE: April 2, 2025 ORDER The appeal as to entitlement to service connection for a nerve disability is dismissed. FINDING OF FACT In March 2025, the Veteran died while this appeal was pending before the Board. CONCLUSION OF LAW Due to the death of the Veteran, the criteria for the dismissal of this appeal have been met. 38 U.S.C. § 7104; 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302. REASONS AND BASES FOR FINDING AND CONCLUSION The Veteran served on active duty for training (ACDUTRA) from April 1975 to September 1975, and on active duty from August1978 to March 1979. He appealed a November 2015 rating decision by the Agency of Original Jurisdiction (AOJ) denying service connection for a nerve disability. Unfortunately, the Veteran died during the pendency of the appeal. Therefore, as a matter of law, the Board cannot issue a decision on the underlying claims at this time and must dismiss this appeal. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302(a). The Board's dismissal does not affect the right of an eligible person to take the Veteran's place to continue the appeal on the pending claims. This process, known as substitution, must be requested within one year of the Veteran's death. 38 C.F.R. § 3.1010(a), (b). Individuals who may be eligible for substitution include the Veteran's surviving spouse, dependent children, dependent parents, and those who bore the expenses of last sickness or burial. 38 C.F.R. §§ 3.1000(a), 3.1010(a). In this case, no one has requested to substitute for the Veteran. Any person who would like to request substitution must submit a VA Form 21P-0847, "Request for Substitution of Claimant Upon Death of Claimant." The form and filing instructions are available online at https://www.va.gov/find-forms/. If the AOJ receives a request for substitution within one year of the Veteran's death and then grants the request, this dismissed appeal will resume its place on the Board's docket. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1302(a). . DONNIE R. HACHEY Veterans Law Judge Board of Veterans' Appeals Attorney for the Board M. Salazar, Counsel The Board's decision in this case is binding only with respect to the instant matter decided. This decision is not precedential and does not establish VA policies or interpretations of general applicability. 38 C.F.R. § 20.1303.