Breadcrumb

Healthcare Inspection – Peer Review for Quality Management Concerns, Huntington VA Medical Center, Huntington, West Virginia

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
15-00223-196
VISN
State
West Virginia
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Recommendations
6
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
OIG conducted a healthcare inspection of the peer review process for quality management at the Huntington VA Medical Center (facility), Huntington, WV. We identified concerns while conducting a Combined Assessment Program review of the facility, which included an evaluation of Peer Review Committee activities. We found that in the cases we evaluated that were referred for peer review peer reviewers did not consistently address and document a comprehensive exploration of possible event causes. We also found (1) incomplete Peer Review Committee oversight of initial peer reviews; (2) an inappropriate but otherwise qualified individual conducted initial peer reviews; (3) that an individual was uncomfortable about conducting a peer review; and (4) that a peer reviewer conducting an initial review lacked qualifications required of a peer relative to the episode of care under review. We recommended that the Facility Director ensure peer reviewers identify and evaluate surgical and non-surgical clinical events, service-level committees adhere to the Veterans Health Administration’s peer review directive when conducting initial peer reviews and consider ensuring secondary reviews of all such cases, the Peer Review Committee provide final Level of Care assignments in writing for all cases brought before it, that service chiefs select peer reviewers to conduct initial peer reviews and that peer review processes provide means for peer reviewers to withdraw when uncomfortable about conducting reviews, that initial peer reviewers possess the qualifications required of peers relative to the episode of care under review and that all identified cases are reviewed and the initial peer review is repeated for those cases not conducted in compliance with the Veterans Health Administration’s peer review directive.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that peer reviewers identify and evaluate surgical and non-surgical clinical events [redacted pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 5705].
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director maintain full compliance with the Veterans Health Administration’s peer review directive when service-level committees conduct initial peer reviews and consider ensuring secondary review of all such cases [redacted pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 5705].
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that the Peer Review Committee provides final Level of Care assignments in writing for all cases brought before it.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that service chiefs select peer reviewers to conduct initial peer reviews and that protected peer review processes provide means for peer reviewers to withdraw when uncomfortable about conducting reviews.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that initial peer reviewers possess the qualifications required of peers relative to the episodes of care under review.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director review all cases [redacted pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 5705]. and repeat the initial peer review process for those cases not conducted in compliance with the Veterans Health Administration’s peer review directive.