Breadcrumb

Inspection of the VA Regional Office Louisville, Kentucky

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
17-00394-298
VISN
State
Kentucky
District
VA Office
Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
Report Author
Office of Audits and Evaluations
Report Type
Audit
Recommendations
5
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
In December 2016, OIG evaluated the Louisville VARO to determine how well VSC staff processed disability claims, how timely and accurately they processed proposed rating reductions, how accurately they input claims-related information, and how well VARO staff responded to special controlled correspondence. Staff did not consistently process one of the two types of disability claims we reviewed. OIG reviewed 30 veterans’ TBI claims and found staff accurately processed all 30 claims. OIG reviewed 30 SMC benefits claims and found that an RQRS and RVSRs incorrectly processed 11 claims due to ineffective training and weaknesses in the VSC’s second signature review process. Overall, VSC staff incorrectly processed 11 of the 60 disability claims OIG reviewed— resulting in 160 improper payments to nine veterans totaling approximately $146,000. OIG reviewed 30 rating reductions cases and found that staff delayed 13 cases because staff placed higher priority on other workloads. This resulted in 128 improper monthly payments, representing approximately $140,000 in overpayments. OIG reviewed 30 newly established claims and found staff did not correctly input claim and claimant information into the electronic systems in 14 claims generally because staff were unaware of VBA policies. The VARO did not process any special controlled correspondence within the scope of our inspection. Therefore, we were unable to assess VARO staff’s effectiveness in this area. OIG recommended the Louisville VARO Director develop a plan to monitor the effectiveness of training, strengthen oversight, and assess the accuracy of secondary reviews involving higher-level SMC; ensure oversight of proposed rating reduction cases; and provide training for claims establishment procedures. The VARO Director concurred with our recommendations; planned corrective actions are responsive.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
We recommended the Louisville VA Regional Office Director assess the effectiveness of the most recent refresher training for higher level special monthly compensation.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
We recommended the Louisville VA Regional Office Director implement a plan to strengthen oversight and assess the accuracy of secondary reviews involving higher-level special monthly compensation and ancillary benefits.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
We recommended the Louisville VA Regional Office Director implement a plan to ensure prioritization of proposed rating reduction cases for completion at the expiration of the due process time period.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
We recommended the Louisville VA Regional Office Director implement a plan to conduct training that emphasizes date of claim policies and accurate contention classifications, and to monitor the effectiveness of the training.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA)
We recommended the Louisville VA Regional Office Director implement a plan to strengthen oversight for newly hired staff who establish claims.