Breadcrumb

Healthcare Inspection - Patient Mental Health Care Issues at a Veterans Integrated Service Network 16 Facility

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
16-03576-53
VISN
State
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Recommendations
12
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
OIG conducted a healthcare inspection to assess the merit of allegations from a complainant about mental health care provided to a patient at a Veterans Integrated Service Network 16 facility, prior to his suicide. We substantiated that the patient had been reasonably stable on his medication regimen, including clonazepam, for many years and that the patient was not placed back on his preferred medication (clonazepam) by psychiatrists despite his requests to do so. We substantiated that the patient was not admitted to the psychosocial residential rehabilitation treatment program and identified several barriers to the patient’s admission including misconceptions about admission criteria, delays in tuberculosis testing, poor communication between providers, and delays in contacting the patient. We found that, contrary to VHA policy, the patient’s treatment preferences were not considered, nor was the patient informed of his right to appeal treatment decisions made by mental health staff. Furthermore, refusal on the part of the patient’s psychiatrist to treat the patient unless he agreed to not taking clonazepam created a treatment impasse and violated Veterans Health Administration policy. We found that because of limited availably of psychiatry appointments, the patient did not have timely access to mental health care after his discharges from community psychiatric hospitals and as his mental health condition worsened, and other care options, such as Non-VA care, were not explored. We found that communication and planning by the patient’s mental health providers was not commensurate with the patient’s needs. In spite of the patient’s deteriorating mental health condition, multiple suicide attempts, and frequent hospitalizations, his underlying bipolar disease was not adequately treated, and ultimately, his poorly controlled mood disorder was the likely underlying cause for the patient’s suicidal thinking. We made 12 recommendations.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure usage of only approved policies regarding use of benzodiazepines and facility managers monitor compliance.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure facility managers revise the patient complaint policy to include the VHA requirement for a clinical appeals process and to educate clinicians about the VHA requirement for clinical appeals and monitor compliance.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that the Psychosocial Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Program committee admission screening process isappropriate and timely and that facility managers monitor compliance.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that mental health clinicians administer tuberculosis tests (purified protein derivative) when needed forPsychosocial Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Program admission and that facility managers monitor compliance.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that Mental Health services areprovided timely for patients designated as high risk for suicide that have beenrecently discharged from community hospitals.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that non-VA care for psychiatricservices is offered to patients who need to be seen sooner than VA appointmentavailability permits.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director request that the Veterans IntegratedService Network Mental Health Program Manager evaluate facility Mental HealthServices and programs for opportunities for improvement.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that a Mental Health Treatment Coordinator policy is implemented as required by the Veterans Health Administrationand that all patients receiving mental health services are assigned a Mental Health Treatment Coordinator.
No. 9
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure compliance with medication reconciliation as required by facility policies.
No. 10
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that Suicide Behavior Reports are completed for all patient suicide attempts and that the Patient Safety Manager is added as a signer as required by facility policy.
No. 11
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director ensure that a peer review screening is completed for patients who have attempted suicide within 30 days of seeing a health care professional as required by facility policy.
No. 12
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
We recommended that the Facility Director initiate an external peer review to determine whether mental health staff appropriately managed the patient’s bipolar illness. Based on the results of that peer review, the Facility Director should consult with the Office of Chief Counsel regarding an institutional disclosure, if appropriate.