Breadcrumb

Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection of the Syracuse VA Medical Center in New York

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
21-00294-128
VISN
2
State
New York
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program
Report Topic
Patient Safety
Major Management Challenges
Healthcare Services
Leadership and Governance
Recommendations
7
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program report provides a focused evaluation of the quality of care delivered in the inpatient and outpatient settings of the Syracuse VA Medical Center and multiple outpatient clinics in New York. The inspection covered key clinical and administrative processes that are associated with promoting quality care. It focused on Leadership and Organizational Risks; COVID-19 Pandemic Readiness and Response; Quality, Safety, and Value; Registered Nurse Credentialing; Medication Management: Remdesivir Use in VHA; Mental Health: Emergency Department and Urgent Care Center Suicide Risk Screening and Evaluation; Care Coordination: Inter-facility Transfers; and High-Risk Processes: Management of Disruptive and Violent Behavior. At the time of the inspection, the medical center’s executive leadership team appeared stable, with all positions permanently assigned. Leaders had worked together almost five months, although some had served in their positions for more than five years. Employee survey data revealed opportunities for leaders to improve servant leadership and decrease employees’ feelings of moral distress. Patients generally appeared satisfied with the care provided. The OIG’s review of the accreditation findings did not identify any organizational risk factors. However, the OIG noted concerns related to patient safety and risk management. Executive leaders were generally knowledgeable about selected data used in Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning models and should continue to take actions to sustain and improve performance. The OIG issued seven recommendations for improvement in three areas: (1) Leadership and Organizational Risks • Sentinel events and institutional disclosures (2) Quality, Safety, and Value • Systems redesign and improvement coordinator meeting participation • Surgical work group administration and data analysis (3) High-Risk Processes • Disruptive behavior committee meeting attendance • Staff training

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Medical Center Director determines the reasons for noncompliance and makes certain that leaders identify adverse events as sentinel events when criteria are met.
No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Medical Center Director evaluates and determines any additional reasons for noncompliance and ensures that leaders conduct institutional disclosures for all sentinel events.
No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Medical Center Director evaluates and determines any additional reasons for noncompliance and ensures the Systems Redesign Coordinator consistently participates in Veterans Integrated Service Network Systems Redesign Review Advisory Group meetings.
No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Medical Center Director evaluates and determines any additional reasons for noncompliance and ensures that the Surgical Work Group meets monthly and core members consistently attend meetings.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Chief of Staff evaluates and determines any additional reasons for noncompliance and makes certain that the Surgical Work Group analyzes efficiency and utilization metrics and evaluates critical surgical events.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Chief of Staff and Associate Director for Patient and Nursing Services evaluate and determine any additional reasons for noncompliance and ensure all required representatives attend Disruptive Behavior Committee meetings.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Medical Center Director evaluates and determines any additional reasons for noncompliance and ensures staff complete all required prevention and management of disruptive behavior training based on the risk level assigned to their work areas.