Breadcrumb

Deficiencies in Suicide Risk Assessments, Continuity of Care, and Leadership at the South Bend Vet Center in Indiana

Report Information

Issue Date
Report Number
21-02511-28
VISN
State
Indiana
District
VA Office
Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
Report Author
Office of Healthcare Inspections
Report Type
Hotline Healthcare Inspection
Report Topic
Suicide Prevention
Major Management Challenges
Healthcare Services
Leadership and Governance
Recommendations
8
Questioned Costs
$0
Better Use of Funds
$0
Congressionally Mandated
No

Summary

Summary

The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an inspection to assess allegations and concerns related to quality client care and leadership at the South Bend Vet Center (facility) in Indiana. The facility is aligned under Readjustment Counseling Service’s (RCS) Midwest district 3. The OIG substantiated facility staff inaccurately assessed the suicide risk level for three clients. Facility staff documented clients’ risk factors for suicide but failed to account for the risks when assigning risk levels. The OIG found the assigned levels lower than clinically indicated. The OIG substantiated the vet center director (VCD) guided staff to rate suicide risk levels low to avoid RCS leader involvement. This guidance, the VCD’s clinical and leadership competency deficits, and staff’s lack of understanding suicide risk evaluation and management contributed to the inaccurate levels. The VCD failed to provide adequate oversight and instruction to a counseling intern, including on actions needed to mitigate suicide risk. The OIG substantiated the VCD failed to facilitate a time-sensitive transition of care and ensure measures, consistent with a client’s high-risk behaviors, hospitalization, and post-hospitalization needs, were in place. The client subsequently died by suicide. The OIG considered the failure to mitigate suicide risk an adverse event. The OIG determined a district leader, who removed the VCD from clinical care, failed to report clinical deficiencies to the state licensing board. Further, RCS lacked a clear process for state licensing board reporting. The OIG found district leaders failed to ensure remediation of repeat deficiencies identified during the facility’s quality reviews. The OIG made three recommendations to the Chief Readjustment Counseling Officer related to adverse events, intern oversight, and state licensing boards. The OIG made five recommendations to the Midwest District 3 Director related to assessing and mitigating suicide risk, continuity of care, adverse events, and state licensing board reporting.

Open Recommendation Image, SquareOpenClosed and Implemented Recommendation Image, CheckmarkClosed-ImplementedNot Implemented Recommendation Image, X character'Closed-Not Implemented
No. 1
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The Midwest District 3 Director ensures the South Bend Vet Center Director and counselors complete suicide risk assessments and assign risk levels based on client risk factors, reevaluate levels when risk factors change, and monitors staff’ compliance.

No. 2
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The Midwest District 3 Director ensures the South Bend Vet Center Director and counselors consistently mitigate clients’ risk for suicide, as appropriate, by developing personalized safety plans, seeking clinical consultation, increasing client contact efforts, and completing crisis reports, and monitors compliance.

No. 3
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)

The Midwest District 3 Director ensures that when clients are transferred from one counselor to another, relevant clinical information is communicated, applicable safety measures are in place, services are not disrupted, and when possible, a joint session with the outgoing and incoming counselor is held with the client.

No. 4
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Midwest District 3 Director reviews Client 1’s post-hospitalization care and the care coordination from the intern to a new counselor and determines if an adverse event disclosure is warranted.
No. 5
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Chief Readjustment Counseling Officer reviews VHA Directive 1004.08, Disclosure of Adverse Events to Patients, and develops a clear policy or protocol outlining the pathway for Readjustment Counseling Service leaders to comply with adverse event reporting, and monitors reporting compliance.
No. 6
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Chief Readjustment Counseling Officer ensures that prior to Readjustment Counseling Service accepting new interns, Readjustment Counseling Service leaders develop and implement a formalized intern orientation and training curriculum, as well as a clear supervisory oversight and safety protocol.
No. 7
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Midwest District 3 Director evaluates whether the Vet Center Director’s clinical practice warrants reporting to the state licensing board and takes action, as indicated.
No. 8
Closed and Implemented Recommendation Image, Checkmark
to Veterans Health Administration (VHA)
The Chief Readjustment Counseling Officer reviews VHA Directive 1100.18, Reporting and Responding to State Licensing Boards, and develops a clear policy or protocol outlining the pathway for Readjustment Counseling Service leaders to evaluate substandard care or ethical violations by licensed counselors, and when appropriate, reports concerns to state licensing boards.